Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Week #3 - Ancient Near Eastern Art

Votive Figures
From the Square Temple, Eshnunna c. 2900-2600 BCE.
Limestone, alabaster, and gypsum; largest is 30".
Twelve fairly small statues are displayed together, showing a collection of Sumerian votive figures intended to be used as dedications to the gods.  These sculptures evoke veneration, peace and worship.  Each figure is unique and that gives a sense that they were probably carved by different artists.  The stylized features of these statues is conventional of Sumerian carvers and suggests these people had fairly strict standards for their offering statue carvers.

These sculptures are carved in the round and the artist(s) chose to have negative space between the elbows when carving the arms which are all in a praying gesture.  These statues weren't necessarily meant to be viewed by people, but meant to be offered to the gods as a way for the god(s) to bestow favor upon the person pictured.  When viewed out of context (i.e. in a Sumerian temple at an offering table), these statues, individually, would invoke the same sense of veneration, peace and prayer that they do together because of their calm facial arrangement and the arrangements of their hands and arms.



All figures have an "attentive gaze" (p. 31, Stokstad & Cothren) which makes the viewer feel stared at, worshiped and suggests the Sumerians used these statues "as a stand-in for the donor, locked in eye-contact with the god, caught perpetually in the act of worship."  In order to feel "locked in" by the eyes of the statues, the artist accentuated the eyes and eyebrows into wide open gazes.  These gazes are actually unsettling because they don't let you out of the stare, they always win the staring contest.  Even though the eyes are unsettling, they are also constant, which gives the viewer a sense of steadiness and peace.

Both men and women are wearing the same mode of dress, except the men have beards and are bare chested, whereas the women wear similar clothes, but have a covering.  Giving the persons depicted the same type of clothing depicts a particular style of dress when worshiping.

In making these figures out of stone, the artist and donor, as they are referred to in the book, wanted these to last their entire life.  They are given a sense of permanence because of the rock they are made out of and therefore seem more solid, and permanent fixtures.

Although the bodies are not exactly realistically carved, they are all carved in the same basic cylindrical shape, giving a sense of uniformity through the pieces.  This shows an adherence to traditional practices and a respect of that tradition.  Most of the figures are standing on a platform, and those platforms often have an inscription, which can talk up the donor's conquests on behalf of the god, or can talk about how devoted the donor is to the god in other ways (p. 31, Stokstad & Cothren).

Seeing how many of these statues there seem to be, and assuming that many more were destroyed since their creation, it would seem the Sumerians worshiped often and had strong religious beliefs.

5 comments:

  1. You have some good ideas here! What about the vertical orientation of the statues, or the fact that they are all standing upright? I think that this composition might also be able to fit within your ideas of peace or worship.

    -Prof. Bowen

    ReplyDelete
  2. Again, I enjoyed reading your post. It was well written with nice transitions between paragraphs.

    What about the fact that they are all the same color? They look to be unpainted and left the natural color of the stone. IF they were in fact left unpainted, do you think this was part of the Sumerian standards for these votive statues? It's interesting because they took time to inlay shell, stone, and bitumen around the eyes but left the rest of the figure undecorated with color. It definitely creates a uniformity and draws the eye to the emphasis of their "attentive gaze".

    Sarah

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have to agree with Prof Bowen, I feel you should have touched more on their posture. About how they are in a fixed gaze with the god they are worshiping, in a permanent prayer stance, and how solemn and respect orientated they are, especially because in our culture today the "big dopey eyed" look is kind of goofy. Also what about that some of them are sitting and some are kneeling? You did a good job of addressing the clothing choice and the fact that they are stylized all the same. I feel this is an important fact for this time period, because it seems that characters made in this time seem to all look almost the same.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Wow, what a gripping argument. I had never thought of statues in such a live and moving manner. To be caught in the perpetual gaze of an inanimate object is a scary proposition. Having a clone or stand in for the average human in the face of God is a less than warm and fuzzy idea. It seems reminiscent of slavery in some deep gutteral form. These statues have a very strong and powerful effect when seen from the point of view in your description.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I didn't touch on the idea of their being mostly positioned in an upright fashion. It would be worth it to explore this idea a little more.
    Perhaps the way to worship in Sumerian times was to stand in veneration, with hands together, one over the other.
    I couldn't tell whether the shortest statue on the right is kneeling or if it is simply missing the base and legs, which is why I was hesitant to mention it.

    @Joy: It does put the statue in constant vigil to their God. What does it mean to them if a person doesn't have one? Did they ever get stolen, moved, break? What happened to the person?

    ReplyDelete

Don't forget to save your comment to a document! You don't want to have to remember what you wrote in case Blogger eats it!